• Power Corridors Magazines
  • Advertise with us
Tuesday, July 8, 2025
  • Login
Power Corridors
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Technology
  • Appointments/Transfers
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
    • IPL 2024
  • Event
  • World
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Technology
  • Appointments/Transfers
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
    • IPL 2024
  • Event
  • World
No Result
View All Result
Power Corridors
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Appointments/Transfers
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Event
  • World
Home Blog

The Mate Case (Part 5): Why SC Must Go for UAPA Bail Reform

Navin Upadhyay by Navin Upadhyay
8 July 2025
in Blog
30
The Mate Case (Part-4): Why a Dreaded Militant Walks Free Despite More Evidence
31
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

In the final part of our five-part series on Thangminlen Mate’s arrest and re-arrest, we examine how the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act enables prolonged detention without trial. With no requirement for hard evidence—just a prima facie claim—UAPA’s bail clause is being increasingly questioned by legal experts and rights advocates. Mate’s case exposes the urgent need for reform.

By Navin Upadhyay

July 8, 2025 — The case of Thangminlen Mate, a schoolteacher from the Mate community arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), has reignited national debate over the stringent bail conditions embedded in India’s anti-terror law. As the nation marked the fourth anniversary of Father Stan Swamy’s custodial death, civil society groups and legal experts are once again raising concerns over what they describe as an erosion of civil liberties and due process.

Mate, who was apprehended by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on May 19, 2025, is being held without bail, based primarily on testimonies from ten Manipur Police Commando personnel—not physical evidence. The charges stem from a violent attack on January 17, 2024, in which heavily armed assailants allegedly linked to Kuki militants targeted a police post in Moreh, killing one IRB rifleman and injuring two others.

The prosecution has invoked Section 16 of the UAPA (punishment for terrorist acts), insisting that Mate is an “influential person” whose release on bail would pose a risk to public safety and compromise witness testimony. Public Prosecutor D. Bharadwaj argued before the Special Court that prima facie evidence exists and emphasized that UAPA’s strict bail provisions—Sections 43D(5) and (6)—apply in full force.

READ: Tribals Show the Way in Manipur, Hill Districts Lead Peace and Justice Index

Citing the recent Supreme Court ruling in Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2024), Bharadwaj underscored that courts must reject bail applications if any prima facie link between the accused and the alleged offence is found, regardless of the strength of actual evidence.

“The UAPA reverses the traditional jurisprudence that bail is the rule and jail the exception,” Bharadwaj argued. “Here, jail is the rule.”

Mate’s defense, however, contends that his arrest was arbitrary, lacking evidentiary substance, and rooted solely in police testimonies under Section 161 Cr.P.C., which are not admissible as substantive evidence during trial. They allege that no weapon, communication, or material proof links him to the Moreh attack, and that he has no past criminal record.

READ: Land, Autonomy, and Protest: Assam’s Tribals Hold the Key to 2026 Polls

Echoes of Stan Swamy

Mate’s situation has drawn stark parallels to the case of Father Stan Swamy, the 84-year-old Jesuit priest and tribal rights activist who died on July 5, 2021, while in judicial custody under similar UAPA charges. Swamy was arrested in 2020 in connection with the Bhima Koregaon–Elgar Parishad case, accused of Maoist links based on questionable digital evidence and contested documents.

Despite battling Parkinson’s disease, hearing loss, and eventually COVID-19, his multiple bail pleas were repeatedly denied. Courts ruled that “community interest outweighs personal liberty” under UAPA. He died shortly before another scheduled bail hearing, after months of deteriorating health in Taloja Central Jail.

The Mate Case (Part-3): NIA Relies Solely on Manipur Police Claims https://t.co/ynHuYJvgmd #ThangminlenMate #UAPA #MorehArrest #JusticeInManipur #NIA #HumanRights #KukiZo#SupremeCourt #ManipurPolice

— Navin Upadhyay (@Navinupadhya) July 6, 2025

A Law Above Due Process?

Dozens of other similar cases  have come to symbolize what critics describe as the draconian spirit of UAPA, especially its bail provision under Section 43D(5), which requires courts to deny bail if they believe the accusations are prima facie true. This threshold is worryingly low, as courts are not required to examine the reliability or sufficiency of evidence—only that such accusations exist.

That means Section 43D(5) transforms bail hearings into rubber-stamp procedures. If an investigating agency invokes UAPA and files a chargesheet, the accused can be locked up indefinitely even before a trial begins. So guilty or innocent, Mate may rot in jail for years to come.

The Supreme Court, while upholding UAPA’s constitutionality, has warned that the “grave consequences” of UAPA demands “judicial circumspection.” However, critics argue that these warnings remain toothless when courts continue to deny bail mechanically.

A Pattern of Prolonged Incarceration

Dozens of undertrial prisoners—activists, academics, students, and community leaders—remain in jail under UAPA with no convictions, some for over five years. The Human Rights Watch and UN Special Rapporteurs have flagged these trends as violations of India’s constitutional protections and international human rights obligations.

In many cases, including those of Sudha Bharadwaj, Gautam Navlakha, and G.N. Saibaba, the prosecution’s case relies on questionable digital forensics, confessions under duress, or testimonies without cross-examination.

Civil liberties lawyers argue for a return to the foundational principle that an accused is innocent until proven guilty, and that preventive detention should not become a substitute for conviction.

A Law That Tilts the Scales: Bail Conditions in Mate Case

In Mr. Thangminlen Mate’s bail hearing, the prosecution relied heavily on the strict bail conditions under Section 43D(5) and (6) of the UAPA, which place an almost insurmountable hurdle before any accused seeking bail under the Act. Public Prosecutor D. Bharadwaj argued that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gurwinder Singh vs State of Punjab (2024) made it explicitly clear that courts must reject bail applications if there are reasonable grounds to believe the allegations are prima facie true.

READ: Burnt Homes, Broken Trust: Manipur’s Unrealistic Relief Plan

The prosecution asserted:

  • The phrase “shall not be released” in Section 43D(5) UAPA stands in stark contrast to “may be released” in ordinary bail provisions under CrPC, reflecting the legislature’s intent to make denial of bail the norm, not the exception.
  • Under UAPA, the court’s role is not to weigh the evidence thoroughly as in a full trial, but to simply assess whether prima facie allegations exist, even if based solely on police statements under Section 161 CrPC.
  • The prosecution emphasized that general bail principles, like “bail is the rule, jail is the exception”, do not apply in UAPA cases. Instead, jail becomes the rule by legislative design.
  • The bail test under UAPA is “highly restrictive in scope”, requiring courts to first reject bail on prima facie grounds, before even considering the standard tripod test of flight risk, witness tampering, or evidence destruction.

In Mate’s case, although no material evidence was presented, and the prosecution’s case rested on police testimonies alone, Bharadwaj maintained that this met the “low threshold” of prima facie truth needed to trigger the bar on bail.

As Mate’s case proceeds through the courts, it may yet become another milestone in India’s ongoing struggle between security and liberty, and law and justice.

 

Tags: Stan SwamyThangminlen MateUAPA
Plugin Install : Subscribe Push Notification need OneSignal plugin to be installed.
Previous Post

Tribals Show the Way in Manipur, Hill Districts Lead Peace and Justice Index

Next Post

Amarnath Yatra Crosses 1 Lakh Mark in Under One week

Related Posts

Analysis! Are We Doing Enough to Combat the Rise in Cancer Cases?
Blog

Analysis! Are We Doing Enough to Combat the Rise in Cancer Cases?

7 July 2025
Chirag Paswan’s ‘243 Seats’ Gambit: Will He Walk the Talk?
Blog

Chirag Paswan’s ‘243 Seats’ Gambit: Will He Walk the Talk?

7 July 2025
Myanmar refugees
Blog

Thousands of Myanmar Refugees Flee to Mizoram Amid Chin Rebel Clashes

7 July 2025
Land, Autonomy, and Protest: Assam’s Tribals Hold the Key to 2026 Polls
Blog

Land, Autonomy, and Protest: Assam’s Tribals Hold the Key to 2026 Polls

7 July 2025
The Mate Case (Part-4): Why a Dreaded Militant Walks Free Despite More Evidence
Blog

The Mate Case (Part-4): Why a Dreaded Militant Walks Free Despite More Evidence

7 July 2025
Honoring a Life of Light: Celebrations Across Continents for Dalai Lama at 90
Blog

Opinion: India Can’t Stay Neutral on Dalai Lama’s Succession

7 July 2025
Next Post
Amarnath Yatra Crosses 1 Lakh Mark in Under One week

Amarnath Yatra Crosses 1 Lakh Mark in Under One week

Key Accused in Gopal Khemka Murder Shot Dead in Police Encounter

Key Accused in Gopal Khemka Murder Shot Dead in Police Encounter

Karnataka Woman

India’s Week of Horror: Four Superstition-Fueled Tragedies Across States

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

POWER CORRIDORS

Former Vice President Venkaiah Naidu commended Power Corridors as a commendable news magazine, affirming that it not only upholds Media Dharma but also fulfills its societal obligations. Power Corridors, as its name implies, delves into realpolitik—examining the essence of influential circles, unraveling the intricacies of political maneuvers, and exploring the pulse of the state’s affairs. However, it transcends mere power dynamics, encompassing a broader spectrum of issues beyond the confines of Delhi’s elite circles.

For PC, which is published by the Interactive Forum on Indian Economy, not only highlights the issues of the day but also throws up what ought to be the subjects that the country should be debating about. It reports about the plans, strategies, and agendas of politicians and others; it also sets the agenda for the nation.

Browse by Category

  • Appointments/Transfers
  • Automobile
  • Aviation
  • Blog
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Event
  • GMF
  • HEALTH
  • IFIE
  • IPL 2024
  • Law
  • Motorsports
  • National
  • News
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Space
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • WEIGHT LOSS
  • World

Recent News

Wiaan Mulder’s Epic Reaction on not Chasing Lara’s 400 Wins Hearts

Wiaan Mulder’s Epic Reaction on not Chasing Lara’s 400 Wins Hearts

8 July 2025
Karnataka Woman

India’s Week of Horror: Four Superstition-Fueled Tragedies Across States

8 July 2025
  • About
  • Advertise With Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Power Corridors

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Login
  • News
  • National
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Crime
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Power Corridors