The Al-Udeid strike marks Iran’s most direct military confrontation with U.S. assets in the Gulf, with the Islamic Republic asserting that the operation was a “measured, pinpoint-accurate response” to Western aggression.
BY PC Bureau
June 24, 2025:– Iran on Tuesday declared that its military had carried out a precisely targeted and highly destructive missile strike on the U.S.-operated Al-Udeid Airbase in Qatar, describing the attack as a “successful retaliatory operation” following the recent bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities.
In a statement broadcast on state television and published by official outlets, Iran’s Armed Forces said the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) executed Operation Besharat Fatah with pinpoint precision, claiming that critical infrastructure at the airbase was directly hit and severely damaged.
“Using advanced ballistic systems coded Aba Abdullah Al-Hussein (PBUH), our forces struck the Al-Udeid base with surgical accuracy,” the statement read. “Radar, command centers, and logistics hubs were among the primary targets. The resulting damage was extensive and deliberate.”
READ: Iran strikes U.S. Air Base in Qatar, Gulf on edge.
Iran characterized the strike as a measured but forceful act of self-defense, taken in response to what it called the “unlawful and cowardly assault on peaceful nuclear sites” by the United States—a strike that Tehran blames on former President Donald Trump and his allies in Israel.
“Most Strategic U.S. Asset” in Region Hit
Al-Udeid, the largest U.S. military installation in the region and the forward headquarters of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), was described by Iranian officials as a “nerve center of aggression” and the “primary enabler of anti-Iranian military activity.”
According to the Iranian Armed Forces:
The missile trajectory was precisely calibrated, with satellite and real-time intelligence guiding the strike.
Iranian forces achieved direct hits on multiple high-value targets within the base.
The attack temporarily disrupted drone operations, command relays, and surveillance systems tied to U.S. regional activity.
“This was not symbolic. It was a clear, operationally successful strike,” said IRGC spokesperson Brig. Gen. Ramezan Sharif. “We have shown that distance does not shield the aggressor and that our reach is accurate, powerful, and resolute.”
🇮🇷🇺🇲🔥Iran attacks US airbase in Qatar with ballistic missiles#WorldWarIII #IranIsraelConflict #USattackIran #Iran #IranVsIsrael #nuclear #Qatar pic.twitter.com/GpPz01YOWa
— 🇮🇷 Iranian Armed Forces 🇮🇷 (@IranArmed_force) June 23, 2025
Religious and National Symbolism
Timed days before Muharram, the holy month of mourning in Shia Islam, the operation invoked the memory of Imam Hussein, with the missile codename and statements drawing direct links between the current confrontation and Islamic resistance against tyranny.
“In the spirit of Karbala, we acted with justice against injustice,” said the military statement. “This is not vengeance; it is a defense of dignity, sovereignty, and faith.”
A Warning to the West
Iran framed the operation as both a punishment and a deterrent, warning the United States and its allies that any further acts of aggression would be met with more extensive and damaging strikes.
After attacking a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran, posted on social media saying they “will not surrender.”
The post was accompanied with a picture of a burning American flag. https://t.co/JoTT2fY4Xm pic.twitter.com/3pmJuEffia
— ABC News (@ABC) June 23, 2025
“The White House must understand: American bases are no longer symbols of power—they are targets,” the Iranian Armed Forces said. “What we demonstrated at Al-Udeid is only a fraction of our full retaliatory capability.”
Tehran’s warning extended beyond the U.S. to Israel and regional allies, accusing them of coordinating in acts of aggression and describing the strike as “the first phase of a broader defensive doctrine.”
Qatar’s Response and Disputed Claims
The Qatari Ministry of Defence released a brief statement saying its air defense systems intercepted several missiles and that “minimal damage” occurred at the base. It condemned the attack as a violation of its sovereignty and stated that it reserves the right to respond.
However, Iranian outlets dismissed Doha’s claim of interception, suggesting that any attempted defense was either “too late” or “ineffective against the level of precision involved.”
READ: Big Win for Tribals: Adani Plant Out of Kokrajhar?
So far, no independent satellite or on-ground imagery has confirmed either side’s claims regarding the extent of the damage.
U.S. Yet to Respond
The U.S. Department of Defense has not issued an official response. However, sources confirmed that Donald Trump, who is alleged to have overseen the strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, was in the White House Situation Room monitoring developments.
Intelligence assessments and military evaluations of the Al-Udeid strike are reportedly underway, though senior officials have so far refrained from public comment.
Strategic Impact
Analysts say Iran’s publicly declared use of high-accuracy missiles, coupled with its confidence in having inflicted strategic damage, marks a significant escalation in Tehran’s posture. Whether or not the U.S. chooses to counterstrike could shape the course of conflict in the region for months.
“This wasn’t just a retaliatory slap—it was a deliberate demonstration of range, resolve, and accuracy,” said Dr. Arash Qanbari, a Tehran-based military analyst. “The message is simple: Iran has the ability to strike American military infrastructure with precision and impact.”
